Use the below search options at the bottom of the page to find information regarding recent decisions that have been taken by the council’s decision making bodies.
Alternatively you can visit the officer decisions page for information on officer delegated decisions that have been taken by council officers.
For details of key decisions taken by year please click below
The council must publish a public notice at least 28 clear days before a key decision is to be taken, however the regulations also provide for a shorter period by ‘general exception’ and on rare occasions by ‘special urgency’ (for further information please contact Democratic Services – Democratic@northlincs.gov.uk.)
Decision Maker: Head of Assets and Infrastructure
Decision published: 13/08/2021
Effective from: 20/07/2021
Decision:
To approve the taking of a lease of premises
at 8 to 10 Southgate Mall, Scunthorpe in accordance with section
8.11.1 of the council’s approved scheme of delegations to
officers and appointment of proper officers.
Lead officer: Lesley Barley
Decision Maker: Deputy Chief Executive and Executive Director: Commercial
Decision published: 09/08/2021
Effective from: 29/07/2021
Decision:
To approve the signing of Freeport Outline
Business Case
Lead officer: Lesley Barley
Decision Maker: Director: Adults and Community Wellbeing
Decision published: 09/08/2021
Effective from: 29/07/2021
Decision:
For North Lincolnshire Council to seek tenders
through YorTender and award a contract to continue to provide Life
after Stroke Services; Stroke Recovery, Communication Support and
Prevention service for individuals and their carers who are at risk
of stroke, and stroke / TIA (transient ischaemic attack)
survivors.
Lead officer: Lesley Barley
Decision Maker: Deputy Chief Executive and Executive Director: Commercial
Decision published: 09/08/2021
Effective from: 27/07/2021
Decision:
To approve the signing of Freeport MOU by
NLC
Lead officer: Lesley Barley
Decision Maker: Safer, Stronger Communities - Rural Cabinet Member
Made at meeting: 28/08/2021 - Safer, Stronger Communities - Rural Cabinet Member
Decision published: 28/07/2021
Effective from: 28/08/2021
Decision:
3 CONSULTATION ON COMMUNITY HUB INVESTMENT PROPOSAL - EPWORTH – The Director: Learning, Skills and Culture submitted an urgent report seeking approval to consult on proposals to create a community hub for the Epworth locality.
The council had completed investment in Scunthorpe, Barton, Brigg and Crowle to create integrated, high quality spaces for communities. These spaces enhanced and simplified access to a wide range of information, advice, leisure, health, wellbeing and lifelong learning opportunities, together with encouraging active citizenship. This meant people were enabled to do more to achieve and maintain a good sense of wellbeing.
As well as making best use of the council’s estate and workforce, the community hubs provided local opportunities for residents to access the services, resources and opportunities they required to live safe, well, prosperous and connected lives. The community offer was designed to improve outcomes for people by:
· strengthening individual and community health and well-being
· enhancing resilience and connectivity within the community
· promoting literate communities
· promoting community prosperity
· enabling progression into employment
· raising aspirations
· supporting people when they feel vulnerable
· improving digital access
Epworth was the remaining locality within the community hub programme. The current offer comprised a library, adults wellbeing hub and leisure centre all offering services in separate buildings – although sometimes to the same individuals.
Community access to the council offer would be simplified by bringing the offer together at one location within the Epworth locality. This would create opportunities for better use of land and buildings in the Epworth locality to meet residents needs and support economic growth and renewal. The single point of access would enable an integrated council, community and health offer at a single site, enabling residents with their health and wellbeing.
The council wished to engage with residents on proposals to create a community hub for Epworth. Planned engagement would make use of digital channels as well as in person events (subject to restrictions) and enable everyone to have a voice.
The matter was urgent as the consultation was scheduled to take place on 29 July 2021.
Resolved – That the consultation for community hub proposals for Epworth, as set out in the report, be approved.
Decision Maker: Director: Business Development
Decision published: 16/07/2021
Effective from: 02/06/2021
Decision:
Approval to the disposal of the remaining land
at NEP7 (circa 37.6 acres)
Lead officer: Lesley Barley
Decision Maker: Head of Legal & Information Governance
Decision published: 16/07/2021
Effective from: 02/07/2021
Decision:
To make minor amendments to the Contract
Procedure Rules (‘CPRs’) contained within the
Constitution in respecting of approving exception to the
CPRs.
Lead officer: Lesley Barley
Decision Maker: Planning Committee
Made at meeting: 02/06/2021 - Planning Committee
Decision published: 15/07/2021
Effective from: 02/06/2021
Decision:
The Group Manager – Development Management and Building Control submitted a report containing details of a major application for determination by the committee, including summaries of policy context, representations arising from consultation and publicity and assessment of the applications.
A local resident addressed the committee raising her objections against the application. She was concerned about building outside the development boundary, along with concerns regarding surface drainage and sewerage in the area. She also felt the access road was inadequate and it would all be of detriment to the local residents if it was passed.
The agent highlighted the application was only for reserved matters and the finer details would come at a later date if approved. He indicated that a great deal of work had been undertaken to take into consideration the access, drainage and sewerage and felt that suitable conditions attached to any approval would be sufficient. He also felt that the development would fit in seamlessly next to the existing bungalows.
A letter of objection was read out from the local MP Holly Mumby-Croft.
Councillor Hannigan said they had to take into consideration the opinion of the residents within the community. It was outside the development boundary and had no specific purpose in a rural location. He said it was against a number of planning policies and could not support the application.
Councillor Poole spoke as a ward member with several concerns regarding the application. Mainly he was worried about the access, refuse vehicles being able to reverse into the development and an additional 16 vehicles he felt would cause chaos. He also stated that flooding was a major issue in the village, and this would only add additional pressures onto the current systems. He urged the committee to refuse the application as it was outside of the development line, was not in accordance with several planning policies, and felt that it would have a detrimental impact on residents.
Councillor Grant agreed and said he could not back the application as it was outside the boundary and against policies.
It was moved by Councillor Hannigan and seconded by Councillor Wells –
That planning permission be refused for the following reasons -
1.
The proposed development was contrary to policies RD2 of the North Lincolnshire Local Plan, and CS2, CS3 and CS8 of the adopted Core Strategy, in that the site was located outside of a defined settlement boundary and was not for specific purposes associated with a rural location, which included agriculture, forestry or to meet a special need associated with the countryside.
2.
The proposed development, by virtue of the site being outside the defined settlement boundary for Messingham and the scale of development proposed, was considered to have a significant urbanising effect on the eastern edge of the settlement by introducing a significant level of built form into the rural landscape, to the detriment of its open rural character and appearance of the area. Therefore, the development was considered contrary to policies RD2, H5 and DS1 of the North Lincolnshire Local Plan, and CS2, CS3, CS5 and CS8 of the adopted Core Strategy.
Motion Carried.
Wards affected: Ridge;